Welcome to the billy blog Saturday quiz. The quiz tests whether you have been paying attention over the last seven days. See how you go with the following five questions. Your results are only known to you and no records are retained.
-
Latest book
Reclaiming the State: A Progressive Vision of Sovereignty for a Post-Neoliberal World
Co-authored with Thomas Fazi. To be published by Pluto Books (UK), September 15, 2017.
Go to the The Reclaim the State Project Home Page for more details.
Current book
Eurozone Dystopia: Groupthink and Denial on a Grand Scale – 2015
Chapter 1 – for free.
MMT Textbook – March 2016
Now available for purchase – For details.
2008 book
Full employment abandoned: shifting sands and policy failures
Available from Edward Elgar UK – click image to go to their on-line catalogue
Other Blogs
- New Economic Perspectives
- Warren Mosler
- Peter Martin – The Age
- Michael Perelman
- Bruce McFarling
- Sean Carmody
- Heteconomist
E-Mail subscription
Bill,
just wondering if your thinking is along the lines of this guy http://csper.org/renaissance-20.html in terms of how the big picure works.
I’m a big fan of your site, learnd so much from it. I try to pass it around as widely as I can. While I think you write very well and put issues and ideas in a language that a lay person can understand it, I feel that to most people the ideas around money, moentary system and wider implications are just a bit too abstract and difficult to grasp.
Hence I liked the site above. Would you consider doing something similar i.e series of mini lectures via you tube or something similar.
Regards
hrvoje
Q4 answers 2 and 3 are both partially right (or wrong). Under a gold standard the govt could borrow from the fed (print money) so it does not HAVE to issue debt. And the govt can use net spending to achieve full employment under a gold standard, but only under the right conditions. So you asked which was the “crucial” difference. How many times have you said the advantage of a fiat money system is to allows the govt to conduct policy to achieve full employment that it cannot necessarily do under a gold standard? Or am I reading the question/answers wrong?
«Under a gold standard the govt could borrow from the fed (print money) so it does not HAVE to issue debt.»
But under a gold standard that “money” is redeemable in gold, and unless the government borrows gold (because under a gold standard you either hold or borrow gold) it will be insolvent. You are assuming that under a gold standard the government can borrow in fiat money; but a gold standard means precisely that there is no fiat money, and all paper money is backed by gold.
«And the govt can use net spending to achieve full employment under a gold standard, but only under the right conditions. So you asked which was the “crucial” difference. How many times have you said the advantage of a fiat money system is to allows the govt to conduct policy to achieve full employment that it cannot necessarily do under a gold standard?»
That a government can pursue a more full-employment oriented excess spending policy is possible under the gold standard too; it just has to borrow and spend gold. So that’s not the difference that matters. The big difference is indeed that net spending can be financed with fiat money, because the government in that case can create fiat money out of nothing, but cannot create gold out of nothing, whether or not it intended to use the excess of spending to pursue a full employment policy.