Welcome to the Billy Blog Saturday Quiz. The quiz tests whether you have been paying attention over the last seven days. See how you go with the following questions. Your results are only known to you and no records are retained.
Categories
- Admin
- Britain
- Central banking
- Climate change
- Debriefing 101
- Economics
- Eurozone
- Fantasy Budget
- Friends like this
- Guest blogger
- Higher Education
- Hyperinflation
- IMF
- Inflation
- Japan
- Job Guarantee
- Labour costs
- Labour Force
- Letters to
- Linux
- MMT Textbook
- Music
- National Accounts
- Netherlands
- Permaculture
- Personal
- Politics
- Q&A
- RBA decisions
- Saturday quiz
- Sport
- Teaching models
- Timor-Leste
- UK Economy
- Unemployment Benefits
- US economy
- Youth unemployment
-
Recent Posts
- Saturday Quiz – May 25, 2013
- Buffer stocks and price stability – Part 4
- Australian PBO – another myth-making neo-liberal institution
- Argentina and Greece – credible analogy or not?
- It’s all been for nothing – that is, if we ignore the millions of jobs lost etc
- Our national broadcaster has become part of the problem
- Saturday Quiz – May 18, 2013 – answers and discussion
- Saturday Quiz – May 18, 2013
- Buffer stocks and price stability – Part 3
- Incroyable! – France – cap-in-hand and grateful – and sinking fast
Recent Comments
- Robert on Buffer stocks and price stability – Part 4
- CharlesJ on Buffer stocks and price stability – Part 4
- Kevin Harding on Buffer stocks and price stability – Part 4
- Neil Wilson on Buffer stocks and price stability – Part 4
- stone on Australian PBO – another myth-making neo-liberal institution
- Will F on Saturday Quiz – May 25, 2013
- Andrew on Saturday Quiz – May 25, 2013
- Andrew on Buffer stocks and price stability – Part 4
- Esp Ghia on Saturday Quiz – May 25, 2013
- Neil Wilson on Australian PBO – another myth-making neo-liberal institution
Archives
Other Information
Links
-
My latest book
Full employment abandoned: shifting sands and policy failures
Available from Edward Elgar UK - click image to go to their on-line catalogue
Recommended book
Other Blogs
- Fiscal Sustainability Teach-In
- UMKC
- Warren Mosler
- Peter Martin - The Age
- Michael Perelman
- Bruce McFarling
- Sean Carmody
- Heteconomist
- Stephen Ewald
E-Mail subscription




Thanks for the quizz, Bill Mitchell, it’s a good challenge, helping us to get it right in every nook and cranny.
The premium question was too much for me. I said false, because we know nothing about current account balances. I’m not sure of my answer.
Hi Bill and bloggers!
I don’t understand the answer to question 2, which I got wrong, I am guessing because of confusion on my part about the definition of real surpluses (or about the relation of stocks and flows). Especially if there are unemployed, is not some portion of the stock of real resources necessarily idle, and thus available for consumption by the unemployed? How is that “expropriation”? I imagine a state where the currently unemployed formerly “banked” a bunch of grain with the government, and now are permitted to consume these grain “savings”. Why would the unemployed have to consume the real surpluses of productive workers?
@Jean-Baptiste B,
Damnit, I didn’t even take the foreign sector into consideration. I’m sure that’s why I missed the premium question with a “True” answer.
Correct me if I’m wrong, but the external sector was not relevant in my analysis and answer of Question 5.
Public debt is a stock.
A budget deficit is a flow which increases the size of public debt (in the current operational regime the government has a legal requirement to issue Bonds when it deficit spends).
The maturation of Government Bonds is a flow which reduces the size of public debt.
In year 2, Public Debt will rise by 4% of Real GDP (size of budget deficit) minus the amount of Government Bonds which reach maturity (and are not rolled over) that year.
As GDP rises so does tax revenue. The coupon payments on and maturation of government bonds will have a decreasing impact on the budget deficit.
I am still new to MMT, so my analysis could be entirely flawed. I think Bill mentioned the interest rate and the inflation rates and misdirects. Note that Bill stated that the budget deficit was a percentage of GDP, not Nominal ($)GDP. The fall in the inflation rate is already factored in as part of the calculation which determines Real GDP.
Mosler often says QE removes interest income from the private sector and has a negative impact on AD. I got Q4 right because this is Bill’s blog. I personally don’t think there is enough info to answer the question. Are we looking at a snapshot in time or a time period? Is the central bank paying interest on reserves and is that rate higher or lower than the bonds the govt would have issued?
Habitual Input:
Assume that all real output is generated from productive workers. Then by definition any transfer to unemployed workers is an expropriation from the class of productive workers. Does not matter if at one time you were productive, when you are unemployed you are provided output essentially expropriated from yourself (e.g., when you were productive).
I got the answer wrong too, I was thinking that the expropriation could be gotten from the 1%ers, I missed the fact that they don’t produce anything real.
@pebird
Thanks for that clarification. I can see it holds true for the unemployed “as a class”.