Welcome to the Billy Blog Saturday Quiz. The quiz tests whether you have been paying attention over the last seven days. See how you go with the following questions. Your results are only known to you and no records are retained.
Categories
- Admin
- Britain
- Central banking
- Climate change
- Debriefing 101
- Economics
- Eurozone
- Fantasy Budget
- Friends like this
- Guest blogger
- Higher Education
- Hyperinflation
- IMF
- Inflation
- Japan
- Job Guarantee
- Labour costs
- Labour Force
- Letters to
- Linux
- MMT Textbook
- Music
- National Accounts
- Netherlands
- Permaculture
- Personal
- Politics
- Q&A
- RBA decisions
- Saturday quiz
- Sport
- Teaching models
- Timor-Leste
- UK Economy
- Unemployment Benefits
- US economy
- Youth unemployment
-
Recent Posts
- It’s all been for nothing – that is, if we ignore the millions of jobs lost etc
- Our national broadcaster has become part of the problem
- Saturday Quiz – May 18, 2013 – answers and discussion
- Saturday Quiz – May 18, 2013
- Buffer stocks and price stability – Part 3
- Incroyable! – France – cap-in-hand and grateful – and sinking fast
- A Budget that reduces growth and increases joblessness – for no sound reason
- Serial liars who stand for nothing that is worth supporting
- Neo-liberalism – the antithesis to democracy
- Saturday Quiz – May 11, 2013 – answers and discussion
Recent Comments
- John Hermann on Our national broadcaster has become part of the problem
- Graham Wrightson on It’s all been for nothing – that is, if we ignore the millions of jobs lost etc
- Ralph Musgrave on It’s all been for nothing – that is, if we ignore the millions of jobs lost etc
- CharlesJ on It’s all been for nothing – that is, if we ignore the millions of jobs lost etc
- F. Beard on It’s all been for nothing – that is, if we ignore the millions of jobs lost etc
- pebird on It’s all been for nothing – that is, if we ignore the millions of jobs lost etc
- Günther Grunert on It’s all been for nothing – that is, if we ignore the millions of jobs lost etc
- Ralph Musgrave on It’s all been for nothing – that is, if we ignore the millions of jobs lost etc
- James Schipper on It’s all been for nothing – that is, if we ignore the millions of jobs lost etc
- The Dork of Cork. on It’s all been for nothing – that is, if we ignore the millions of jobs lost etc
Archives
Other Information
Links
-
My latest book
Full employment abandoned: shifting sands and policy failures
Available from Edward Elgar UK - click image to go to their on-line catalogue
Recommended book
Other Blogs
- Fiscal Sustainability Teach-In
- UMKC
- Warren Mosler
- Peter Martin - The Age
- Michael Perelman
- Bruce McFarling
- Sean Carmody
- Heteconomist
- Stephen Ewald
E-Mail subscription




I am not clear on my error in item 3. If the private sector increased its savings rate to 100% I don’t see how the economy could grow. Any smaller amount would still impede growth unless one might equate savings with the equivalent of spending by the entity that received the savings. In any case turnover might enter into this equation.
Dear Thomas (at 2013/03/05 at 3:09)
It would be a very weird economy with no household consumption but the economy could still “grow” if the government sector or foreigners purchased all the output. All government spending could be spent on consumption goods and then handed out to the private sector to sustain the workforce while foreigners spent up big on the rest of the output.
But within realistic ranges, a rising household saving ratio can be offset by a growing external surplus, even if there is fiscal drag on aggregate demand.
best wishes
bill
But your question posited austere government policies leaving only the foreign sector to take up the slack.