Framing Modern Monetary Theory – Presentation

I am not doing much work today. But in the early quietness I was able to finalise an edit of a presentation I gave in Rome on November 24, 2014 on Framing Modern Monetary Theory. So among other things I include today that video is now available. All the best for today.

Here is my Xmas card for 2014 courtesy of – Kipper Williams – of the Guardian.

I think it appropriate for this day and age.

Guardian_Xmas_Cartoon_Card_2014

Framing Modern Monetary Theory – Presentation in Rome, November 24, 2014

I finally found time to edit and create a video from my presentation at the Rome 3 University on November 24, 2014, which was kindly organised by L’associazione MEMMT.info

The original full version with Italian interpretation and the Q&A was filmed and produced by Joel Samuele Beaumont and can be viewed at http://youtu.be/bDETqz2MA1c – the session went for 2 hours and 43 minutes. I captured his video and I thank him for his work.

The version here is 39 minutes and covers the English presentation only. I have cut out the interpreting and the Q&A and some other nondescript time filling bits. I will post the Q&A session separately once the editing is complete.

It is based on work we are doing at present on presenting Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) to a public that has neo-liberal economic concepts ingrained in their basic learning structures.

Stereotyping those on income support and the homeless

I thought this was rather apposite for today. See related story – See what homeless man does with $100.

I might make a good spy

I never buy airlines tickets particularly one-way types with cash the day before. When you travel a lot you work out that the cheapest fares are those that are 3-4 months out of the flight – unless you are prepared to take the risk of standby.

I also never wear T-shirts and never look very scruffy at airports.

It was as if I had been reading the – CIA Assessment on Surviving Seconday Screening – and the – CIA Advice for Operatives Infiltrating Schengen.

CIA_Screening CIA_Infiltration

WikiLeaks has kindly made these two CIA documents public which offer all would-be spies some solid hints on how they can stay undercover and defraud the sovereign rights of nations through the use of false documents to illegally cross international borders.

This information will also help would-be spy novelists get some real world, workshopped information to make their scripts more realistic.

The docuuments were intended for CIA operatives only – not to be shared with even other allied security agencies.

Some of the hints to avoid so-called ‘profiling’ include:

1. Don’t show signs of nervousness at foreign airports – “Physiological signs of nervousness include shaking or trembling hands, rapid breathing for no apparent reason, cold sweats, pulsating carotid arteries, a flushed face, and avoidance of eye contact.” So stay calm.

2. Don’t lie if they ask you at the screening if you are carrying heaps of drugs – “Appearance of lying or withholding information”.

3. Memorise all your previous passport stamps – “Lack of familiarity with passport entries (biographic page, previous travel).”

4. Preferably white out any stamps or visa from bad places – “Stamps or visas from a terrorism-sponsoring country”.

5. Learn all Ten official languages if you intend to spy in South Africa – “Inability to speak the language of the passport-issuing country”.

6. Don’t carry sets of golf clubs if you simultaneously are being assisted by a guide dog for blindness – “Baggage or contents inconsistent with the passenger’s appearance, profession, or ticket class”.

Other hints include:

… do not buy a one-way ticket with cash the day before flying … do not look scruffy while traveling on a diplomatic passport …

The other document tells CIA wannabees how to breach the border security of European nations in order to spy on them and kidnap people for rendition and torture.

The US Administration seems to be a cheery place!

A lighter note

Here is a snippet from my Melbourne band – Pressure Drop. It is a shortened version of a song from our next CD to be released in early 2015.

The audio is the pre-final mix and has some glitches and will be refined in the final mix in January.

It is not about spies.

Conclusion

Season’s greetings.

That is enough for today!

(c) Copyright 2014 William Mitchell. All Rights Reserved.

Spread the word ...
    This entry was posted in Debriefing 101. Bookmark the permalink.

    10 Responses to Framing Modern Monetary Theory – Presentation

    1. laerreal says:

      It’s a shame that, one of the most obvious and startling metaphors used by our sovereign government,is the one that plains off straight over the 1 million plus under-employed and fly’s right past the 777k unemployed
      and heads-off linguistically into some unknown place in our future’s and numerically finds and states a deficit that’s of great concern that they are sure will be 667b…I mean are they for real ! who writes this sh$t…anyway
      I’m as happy as Santa today and hope you are too,I’m not going..I’ve moved in
      Merry Xmas my Friend All the best..Cheers

    2. larry says:

      Brilliant, Bill. I will especially check out the CIA advice. Ha, ha.

      Before WWI, it was possible to travel around Europe without a passport in additoin to all the paraphernalia you need today. All you needed was some kind of documentation that showed who you were. There is a story, possibly apocryphal, that Apollinaire was crossing the French border one day and was asked by a border guard who he was. His reply was to hand him his card and simply say, “I am Apollinaire.”

      Jacob Bronowski told a story about how he once went to the US with the manuscript for his book, The Ascent of Man, in his luggage. A customs official, checking his luggage contents, began looking through it and asked him if he wrote it. Bronowski said that it was a book he was writing. With a chuckle, Bronowski relayed what the official then told him — it ain’t gonna be no best seller. With that, he was allowed to proceed.

      Thanks for the Xmas card.

    3. larry says:

      Bill, golf club advice noted. Many thanks. :-D

    4. Andy says:

      Seasons greetings to you too Bill.
      Just finished painting the kitchen.
      I love Xmas.

    5. laerreal says:

      Morning Bill ,Hope you slept well n
      Sorry i rocked up so late on Xmas night,i forgot to mention my name,it’s Jason Ruby or better known as Jason.
      Pleased to meet you !

    6. Ikonoclast says:

      Bill,

      One thing I think is needed is a full philosphical analysis of what money is. You have probably tackled this extensively in your writings already. I hope I can offer my philosphical musings.

      The evolution of money demonstrates a development from the concrete to the abstract or the real to the nominal. Barter (or the gift economy) is an exchange of a real commodity for another real commodity in the main. The next step seems to be a consumable commodity money (say grain) functioning as a proto-currency. After this comes commodity money only “consumable” as ornament, decoration or as a signifier of status and wealth. Gold is the example par excellence here. Then follows in order gold specie, debased gold specie and then token money and promissory notes linked to a gold standard. This gold standard link becomes ever more tenuous over time. It too is debased or attenuated. After that money is completely nominalised or formalised as a pure fiat currency and its tokens progressively “dematerialised” as electronic transactions and accounting. That’s a potted history of money.

      The important thing to note is the continuous historical process of the dematerialisation and formalisation of money. Another aspect of the formalisation of money is exhibited by the idea of “fictitious capital” to use Marx’s term. Capital as ownership of stocks, bonds etc, asserts owneship over a future income stream where the real production is at yet unrealised (it is in the future) and there is a risk the production might never be realised.

      All this indicates that a theory of money needs, among other things, to abstract what is constant and universal about money from what is historically conditioned. I think the idea of “exchange” gives us the hint. Something must pass both ways or rather two somethings must pass in diametric directions. The history of exchange now shows us that such exchange can be;

      (a) Real for Real
      (b) Nominal for Real (and Real for Nominal)
      (c) Nominal for Nominal

      At least one lesson that can be drawn from this is as follows. The ability of government to remain solvent for longer or even indefinitely longer than might be predicted by naive monetary ideas did not suddenly and completely arise from nothing at the point that a full fiat currency was formally established. Developments in the pre-fiat era were stretching matters in that direction for hundreds of years. Also, the full fiat currency does not alter the fact that a government over-stretching this capacity will eventually face problems ranging from real economy problems, to currency debasement, to loss of currency credibility and various domestic and international economic and political problems.

      It is true, I agree, that neoclassical economics under-stretches the currency issuing capacity in its operation of the macroeconomics system and tolerates (indeed prefers) capacity under-utilisation of both labour and fixed capital (factories, plant, machinery). I posit that neoclassical economics does this as it is a capitalist-oligarch created-captured system and that capitalist-oligarchs can be relatively richer and indeed absolutely richer under this system despite the entire system being poorer in aggregate. This is made possible by the huge inequalities which are intrisic because designed into the system and which become more glaringly manifested over time.

    7. Some Guy says:

      Ikonoclast: MMTers and others have studied the history A LOT. And also the philosophy of money too. The best place to start for both is the papers of Alfred Mitchell-Innes in Wray & Kelton’s Credit and State Theories of Money: The Contributions of A. Mitchell Innes and the papers by Gardiner, Henry, Hudson, Ingham, Kelton, Wray in this volume. The “potted history” reverses the well-documented historical sequence. Basically, the sequence is credit –> state money –> markets, or “commodity money” like gold. Barter never existed anywhere and is not like a gift economy. Something like barter only tends to be seen in the collapse of money-using societies, or in “international trade” between them. Again, credit, Credit money & Fiat money are ancient and underlie all money. Metals are modern.

      So IMHO MMT is quite consistent with and related to the classical (continental, rationalist) view that thinking begins with the abstract and goes to the concrete, not vice versa (analytic, empiricist).

    8. MK10 says:

      Metaphors don’t work very well.
      I tried to explain the national debt to my daughter using a metaphor.
      I said : “The debt is like a high mountain”.
      Her answer : “I thought it was more like a deep hole.”
      Now i’m stuck.

      Best wishes.

    9. Ikonoclast says:

      Some Guy. That alternate history is still contested by various academics. The notion that some ancient barter did not occur seems doubtful to me. While tribes might run a gift economy internally, inter-tribe interactions were likely characterised by swapping or barter at least at times. The earliest anthropological evidence perhaps does not allow a definitive statement on the order of invention. Even with the Trobriand Islanders, several systems seemed to co-exist simultaneously (gifts, exchanges, payments). Presumably the payments were made with tokens, proto-currency or commodity currency. Malinowski distinguished seven types of exchange.

      See Companion Encyclopedia of Anthropolgy, pages 928-929.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    *
    To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the answer to the math equation shown in the picture.
    Anti-spam equation