The Australian Bureau of Statistics released the latest data today – Labour Force, Australia, May 2019 – which reveals a slightly improved labour market although full-time employment growth was weak and total hours worked declined. Underemployment rose slightly (0.1 points) to 8.6 per cent further accentuating the fairly weak overall situation. The total labour underutilisation rate (unemployment plus underemployment) remained steady at 13.7 per cent and the persistence of that level of wastage makes a mockery of claims by commentators that Australia is close to full employment. The other disturbing outcome was that full-time and total teenage employment also fell. My overall assessment is the current situation can best be characterised as remaining in a fairly weak state. Most of the dynamics over the last few months have been due to swings up and down in part-time employment.
The summary ABS Labour Force (seasonally adjusted) estimates for May 2019 are:
- Employment increased 42,300 (0.3 per cent) – full-time employment increased 2,400 and part-time employment increased 39,800.
- Unemployment decreased 2,400 to 704,700 persons.
- The official unemployment rate remained steady at 5.2 per cent.
- The participation rate increased 0.1 points to 66 per cent.
- Aggregate monthly hours worked decreased 5.9 million hours (-0.33 per cent).
- The monthly broad underutilisation estimates for May 2019 show that underemployment increased 0.1 points to 8.6 per cent (1,160.7 thousand). The total labour underutilisation rate (unemployment plus underemployment) remained steady at 13.7 per cent. There were a total of 1,865.4 thousand workers either unemployed or underemployed.
Employment increased 42,300 in May 2019
Employment growth was stronger in May 2019.
Full-time employment increased 2,400 and part-time employment increased 39,800.
The following graph shows the month by month growth in full-time (blue columns), part-time (grey columns) and total employment (green line) for the 24 months to May 2019 using seasonally adjusted data.
The zig-zag pattern where employment growth has regularly been around zero remains evident.
All the dynamics in the last few months have been marked by swings in part-time employment.
The following table provides an accounting summary of the labour market performance over the last six months. As the monthly data is highly variable, this Table provides a longer view which allows for a better assessment of the trends.
1. Total employment has lagged behind population growth which has resulted in the rise in unemployment.
2. Participation has been rising over the period.
Given the variation in the labour force estimates, it is sometimes useful to examine the Employment-to-Population ratio (%) because the underlying population estimates (denominator) are less cyclical and subject to variation than the labour force estimates. This is an alternative measure of the robustness of activity to the unemployment rate, which is sensitive to those labour force swings.
The following graph shows the Employment-to-Population ratio, since February 2008 (the low-point unemployment rate of the last cycle).
It dived with the onset of the GFC, recovered under the boost provided by the fiscal stimulus packages but then went backwards again as the Federal government imposed fiscal austerity in a hare-brained attempt at achieving a fiscal surplus in 2012.
The ratio rose 0.1 points in May 2019 to 62.6 per cent and remains below pre-GFC peak in April 2008 of 62.9 per cent.
To put the current monthly performance into perspective, the following graph shows the average monthly employment change for the calendar years from 2005 to 2019 (the current year having only 4 observations in the average so far – so caution in interpretation is necessary).
It is clear that after some lean years, 2017 was a much stronger year if total employment is the indicator.
It is also clear that the labour market weakened considerably over 2018.
So far 2019, has been stronger than 2018.
To provide a longer perspective, the following graphs shows the average monthly changes in Total employment (upper panel), and Full-time and Part-time employment (lower panel) in thousands since 1980.
The interesting result is that during recessions or slow-downs, it is full-time employment that takes the bulk of the adjustment. Even when full-time employment growth is negative, part-time employment usually continues to grow.
Unemployment decreased 2,400 to 704,700 persons
The official unemployment rate remained steady at 5.2 per cent.
The following graph shows the national unemployment rate from January 1980 to May 2019. The longer time-series helps frame some perspective to what is happening at present.
1. It is still 0.3 points above the level it fell to as a result of the fiscal stimulus (which was withdrawn too early) and 1.2 point above the level reached before the GFC began.
2. There is clearly still considerable slack in the labour market that could be absorbed with fiscal stimulus.
Broad labour underutilisation remained steady at 13.7 per cent
The results based on the Monthly data for May 2019 are (seasonally adjusted):
1. Underemployment increased 0.1 points to 8.6 per cent (1,160.7 thousand).
2. The total labour underutilisation rate (unemployment plus underemployment) remained steady at 13.7 per cent.
3. There were a total of 1,865.4 thousand workers either unemployed or underemployed.
The following graph plots the seasonally-adjusted underemployment rate in Australia from January 1980 to the May 2019 (blue line) and the broad underutilisation rate over the same period (green line).
The difference between the two lines is the unemployment rate.
The three cyclical peaks correspond to the 1982, 1991 recessions and the more recent downturn.
The other difference between now and the two earlier cycles is that the recovery triggered by the fiscal stimulus in 2008-09 did not persist and as soon as the ‘fiscal surplus’ fetish kicked in in 2012, things went backwards very quickly.
The two earlier peaks were sharp but steadily declined. The last peak fell away on the back of the stimulus but turned again when the stimulus was withdrawn.
If hidden unemployment (given the depressed participation rate) is added to the broad ABS figure the best-case (conservative) scenario would see a underutilisation rate well above 15 per cent at present. Please read my blog post – Australian labour underutilisation rate is at least 13.4 per cent – for more discussion on this point.
Teenage labour market deteriorates further in May 2019
Total teenage net employment fell 2.3 thousand in May 2019.
Full-time teenage employment fell by 1 thousand and total part-time employment fell by 1.3 thousand.
The following graph shows the distribution of net employment creation in the last month by full-time/part-time status and age/gender category (15-19 year olds and the rest)
Over the last 12 months, teenagers have lost 8.4 thousand (net) jobs overall while the rest of the labour force have gained 368.7 thousand net jobs.
The following graph shows the change in aggregates over the last 12 months.
In terms of the current cycle, which began after the last low-point unemployment rate month (February 2008), the following results are relevant:
1. Since February 2008, there have been 2,220.7 thousand (net) jobs added to the Australian economy but teenagers have lost 65.3 thousand over the same period.
2. Since February 2008, teenagers have lost 106.1 thousand full-time jobs (net).
3. Even in the traditionally, concentrated teenage segment – part-time employment, teenagers have gained only 40.8 thousand jobs (net) even though 1068.9 thousand part-time jobs have been added overall.
To put the teenage employment situation in a scale context (relative to their size in the population) the following graph shows the Employment-Population ratios for males, females and total 15-19 year olds since February 2008.
You can interpret this graph as depicting the loss of employment relative to the underlying population of each cohort. We would expect (at least) that this ratio should be constant if not rising somewhat (depending on school participation rates).
The absolute loss of jobs reported above has impacted more on males than females.
The male ratio has fallen by 9 percentage points since February 2008, the female ratio has fallen by 4.1 percentage points and the overall teenage employment-population ratio has fallen by 6.6 percentage points.
The other statistic relating to the teenage labour market that is worth highlighting is the decline in the participation rate since the beginning of 2008 when it peaked in February at 61.4 per cent.
In May 2019, the participation rate was 54.8 per cent (down 2 points on the previous month). This is a very unreliable statistic overall – it fluctuates widely on a monthly basis.
However, the difference between the 2008 level, amounts to an additional 89.9 thousand teenagers who have dropped out of the labour force as a result of the weak conditions since the crisis.
If we added them back into the labour force the teenage unemployment rate would be 25 per cent rather than the official estimate for May 2019 of 16.8 per cent.
Some may have decided to return to full-time education and abandoned their plans to work. But the data suggests the official unemployment rate is significantly understating the actual situation that teenagers face in the Australian labour market.
Overall, the performance of the teenage labour market leaves a lot to be desired. The decline in full-time employment for teenagers was particularly worrying.
This situation doesn’t rate much priority in the policy debate, which is surprising given that this is our future workforce in an ageing population. Future productivity growth will determine whether the ageing population enjoys a higher standard of living than now or goes backwards.
I continue to recommend that the Australian government immediately announce a major public sector job creation program aimed at employing all the unemployed 15-19 year olds, who are not in full-time education or a credible apprenticeship program.
Hours worked decreased 5.9 million hours (-0.33 per cent) in May 2019
A very weak result driven by the weak growth in full-time work.
The following graph shows the monthly growth (in per cent) over the last 24 months.
The dark linear line is a simple regression trend of the monthly change – which depicts a slight downward trend – distorted somewhat by the outlier in May 2017.
My standard monthly warning: we always have to be careful interpreting month to month movements given the way the Labour Force Survey is constructed and implemented.
The May data reveals a slightly improved labour market although full-time employment growth was weak and total hours worked declined.
Underemployment rose slightly (0.1 points) to 8.6 per cent further accentuating the fairly weak overall situation.
The total labour underutilisation rate (unemployment plus underemployment) remained steady at 13.7 per cent and the persistence of that level of wastage makes a mockery of claims by commentators that Australia is close to full employment.
The other disturbing outcome was that full-time and total teenage employment also fell.
My overall assessment is:
1. The current situation can best be characterised as remaining in a fairly weak state.
2. Most of the dynamics over the last few months have been due to swings up and down in part-time employment.
3. The Australian labour market remains a considerable distance from full employment. There is clear room for some serious policy expansion at present
That is enough for today!
(c) Copyright 2019 William Mitchell. All Rights Reserved.