skip to Main Content

It isn’t just like household debt!

Yesterday, apparently I disappointed several people by analysing the Australian National Accounts release instead of concentrating on what ripper music release we could discuss. Well, I cannot stop the ABS releasing the GDP data on a Wednesday. But I can call Thursday Wednesday when they do release the data and so here we are. I also have to travel a lot today so it is good that I don’t have to spend much time writing this blog post. The music tribute today is to the famous Bunny Livingstone, one of the best Jamaican musicians who died earlier this week. What else could it be. I also have some other snippets that interested me, including a rather interesting BBC video short which well and truly tells us that Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) ideas are invading the mainstream even if they would never care to admit that publicly. Happy days.

MOOC Modern Monetary Theory: Economics for the 21st Century

Our edX MOOC – Modern Monetary Theory: Economics for the 21st Century – started yesterday (March 3, 2021) and will run for the next four weeks with new material being added each Wednesday as the weeks progress.

When I last checked there were 2,682 total learners (as edX calls the participants), which is a really good sign that people are interested in learning more about Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) in an educational environment.

We have worked hard to provide a diversity of content and allow for a lot of interaction between students in real time.

Here is the latest map of participants (those who volunteer there location – not all do):

Made with Padlet

It looks like we have to make an expedition into Russia and Central Africa to get the MMT train rolling there (-:)

Further Details:

NewcastleX page.

edX page.

It is not too late to become involved.

The course is self-paced learning with some interaction from myself. But all the material is there and you just have to invest some time each week to get through it.

It is designed for the beginner without any prior economics training. That is, it is meant to be as inclusive as possible.

This is our first – MMTed – venture and the experience of putting together a digital on-line learning course will help us in our next ventures – a more advanced course in the coming months.

And I continue to be grateful to those who have donated amounts to help get MMTed off the ground.

The MOOC is a sort of demonstration case of what we think can be achieved.

The functional EU – not!

On December 15, 2020, the Austrian Bundesministerium Soziales, Gesundheit, Pflege and Konsumentenschultz (Federal Ministry of Social Affairs, Health, Care and Consumer Protection) published a document – FAQ: COVID-19 vaccination – which noted that:

The 27 countries of the European Union have established a working mechanism with the European Commission for this purpose. This includes a steering group in which all 27 member states are represented, together with the European Commission. This steering group is co-chaired by Austria together with the European Commission. A joint negotiating team explores and negotiates with the manufacturers and reports to the steering group on a regular basis.

So the Committee dealing with this was co-chaired by a senior Austrian representative.

The process has been mired in secrecy.

See this Report from the Corporate Europe Observatory (February 2, 2021) – Vaccine scarcity: how the EU’s appeasement of Big Pharma damages COVID-19 response.

They sought information through FOI processes from the European Commission, which they documented in this report – Power and profit during a pandemic – why the pharmaceutical industry needs more scrutiny not less (September 21, 2020).

They concluded then that:

In a pandemic the pharmaceutical industry is hailed as a saviour; yet the industry is using the crisis to lock in its problematic, profit-maximising model. Pushing for public money with no-strings-attached, and stronger monopoly patent rules, the industry’s wish-list could restrict access to COVID-19 drugs and vaccines, prolonging the pandemic in the name of profit.

No surprises there, which is why we need nationalised pharmaceutical facilities.

The most recent CEO article reports the refusal of the Commission to disclose anything relevant to the public, including the “names of the members of the Joint Negotiation Team” (mentioned above).

The conclusion is that corporate cabal which is the EU is doing what corporate cabals do, cooperate with other corporate cabals to generate profits and to hell with the rest of us.

Then fast track to this report yesterday in the UK Guardian (March 3, 2021) – Austria and Denmark to work with Israel on future Covid jabs, saying EU ‘too slow’ – which reported that the:

Austria’s chancellor, Sebastian Kurz, described the EU’s vaccination deployment as “too slow” as he announced that his country and Denmark would work with Israel on protecting their citizens against new coronavirus variants …

The move by the two member states to form a vaccine manufacturing partnership comes as the latest figures show that 7.5% of the EU population have received a vaccine dose compared with 52% in Israel and 31% in the UK.

Remember that Austria co-chaired the Joint Negotiating Team – but the EU wouldn’t let us know who the co-chair was (although we all know who it was).

The UK Guardian report quotes Kurz as saying “We must prepare for further mutations and should no longer be dependent solely on the EU in the production of second-generation vaccines” and that Austria “will no longer rely on the EU in the future”.

EU solidarity going on there! Not!

Regular readers will know that while I think the EU should be broken up I have always held that it should be reconstituted as intergovernmental agreements (which democratic states can withdraw from any time they are not working for their citizens).

What purpose would that achieve? Well there are some issues that require scale and impact across currency borders. The pandemic is one of them. We all need to work together to get rid of the virus threat.

But the way the EU has handled this issue doesn’t generate any confidence that even a reconstituted body would work.

And you Remainers out there that still read my blog – what do you think of Austria and Denmark realising the EU has failed them on this life and death issue while the UK is out there vaccinating at a rate of knots?

I know what I think.

This Politico article is background (January 27, 2021) – How Europe fell behind on vaccines. The situation has deteriorated since then.

The paradigm is shifting – and fast

With the release of the latest fiscal statement by the UK government yesterday (March 3, 2021) – which I will write about next week – the commentary has been interesting.

I saw this 45 second snippet from the BBC News which demonstrates just how fast things are shifting.

There seems to be a disconnect within the BBC, which always happens when the old ideas are being jettisoned but the old guard linger.

Here is a headline on their finance page this morning.

It is very entertaining at present seeing the Tories acting all ‘Keynesian’ and the Labour Party chasing its tail wondering how they can spin the debt issue to their advantage, without realising that any such talk just makes them more unelectable than they already are.

They should be seizing this opportunity some years out before the next general election to drive home the ‘skies are not going to be falling in’ narrative – that national debt is private wealth, that fiscal deficits are essential to provide employment and incomes and allow for a green transition and that taxes do not need to rise any time soon.

Go with it and they will be on the winning train.

Music – Simmer Down – RIP Bunny Livingstone

This is what I have been listening to while working this morning in memory of one of the great Jamaican musicians – Bunny Livingstone – who died this week (March 2, 2021) at the age of 73.

This was the first song released by the Wailing Wailers via Studio One – Simmer Down.

The Wailing Wailers were comprised of Bunny Livingstone (aka Bunny Wailer), Bob Marley, Peter Tosh, Junior Braithwaite, Cherry Smith (who did not sing on this song as she was home looking after her child) and Beverley Kelso (backing vocals).

With Bunny Livingstone now gone, Beverley Kelso is the only surviving member of this pathbreaking band.

The band came together when Bob Marley moved to Kingston and lived in the same apartment block as Bunny Livingstone.

The song is about the violent criminal ghetto gangs in Trenchtown (Kingston) who effectively ran the city – the Rudies.

This marked the beginning of Bob Marley’s career and the Wailers fell apart as he started to assert his own career image, which was sad.

The backing band was – The Skatalites – which comprised all the great Jamaican studio players.

It was produced by – Clement Dodd and was released in 1963 and reached No.1 in Jamaica in February 1961.

A classic four-chord song and still one of my favourites.

Here is an obituary for Bunny Livingstone – Bunny Wailer, reggae luminary and last Wailers member, dies aged 73.

Here is his last interview:

And because he is gone and not coming back here is another one of this great songs released in 1981 – Rise and Shine.

This is the 12″ dub version – one of the best. It is still on my regular play list.

That is enough for today!

(c) Copyright 2021 William Mitchell. All Rights Reserved.

Spread the word ...
    This Post Has 27 Comments
    1. “There seems to be a disconnect within the BBC,”

      The disconnect is everywhere. I particularly enjoy Lord Hague’s constant mentioning of MMT in his ill informed opinion pieces. He must be getting his MMT from Lord King.

      Apparently the latest reason we must ‘pay down the debt’ is because a quarter of it is indexed linked. Yes, and mostly owned by UK pension funds and insurance companies who are required to hold them for regulatory reasons. Hence why every one issued last year was sold at a negative redemption yield.

      If it’s a problem don’t issue them. Just offer Granny Bonds from National Savings to individuals and their trustees.

      I had a quick flick through the Red Book yesterday (as you do). I’m no expert on reading tables like C1, but it looked to me that over the next five years we’re going to have next to no output gap despite over 4% unemployment and there’s going to be a productivity miracle that will allow a doubling of the corporation tax take in two years time.

      But perhaps I just don’t understand how marvellous the OBR. After all, as they like to tell us, their forecasts are not quite as wide of the mark as HM Treasury used to be. Therefore their forecasts are still valuable.

    2. For insights into the EU’s economic and political machinations, read Adults in the Room by Yanis Varoufakis. The economics are nonsense – the politics are everything.

    3. That bbc clip is promising,the ball is starting to drop.

      It would be refreshing for politics in the public sphere to be coherent and reflect the framework we have.

    4. “Our edX MOOC – Modern Monetary Theory: Economics for the 21st Century – started yesterday (March 3, 2021) and will run for the next four weeks with new material being added each Wednesday as the weeks progress.”
      Highly recommended after joining the first session. Is there a link to a ‘recording’ for those interested who missed the first session (and for those who find the timing difficult)? Also is there a link to the recent ‘Helsinki’ series for undregraduates?

    5. Dear Michael Galvin (at 2021/03/05 at 12:53 am)

      Thanks for your comment and query.

      But you have not fully grasped how the edX MOOC system works.

      When you say that your joined the ‘first session’ and thought people would miss the ‘first session’ that is not ca correct construction.

      The MOOC will run over 4-weeks. Each new week will unveil the new learning material.

      The material for Week 1 was released last Wednesday (March 3, 2021) at 11:00 Sydney time. It will remain continuously available (24/7) to all participants until the end of the four week period. Then next Wednesday (March 10, 2021 at 11:00 Sydney time), the material for Week 2 will become available, and so on as each week passes.

      So no-one will miss out if they enrol.

      As to my Helsinki lectures which have just been completed, we are editing them at present and once the MOOC is over (getting that organised and operational has been very time consuming) I will post links to the lectures.

      Thanks again, as usual, for your on-going interest.

      best wishes
      bill

    6. My apologies Bill for pre-empting your music section. Here in sort-of lockdown Britain, I’m one of those who is actually staying home in order to hasten the end of the health crisis (also it’s cost me FT employment) so pointers to what day of the week have become more important. I do of course take an interest in commentary on the world outside Blighty including on the economy up above, which I would be living and working a lot closer to if the UK hadn’t made itself a rampant covid pariah state.

    7. The BBC (and a bunch of other people) are still blowing it by referring to bond sales as “borrowing.” When a bond is sold (I’m speaking from a US-centric point of view) a US Government liability created out of thin air by the Treasury is swapped for a different US Government liability created out of thin air by the Federal Reserve. In what sense is that borrowing? It is entirely analogous to what happens when you move money from a checking account to a savings account. That is to say, swapping one bank liability created out of thin air for a different bank liability created out of thin air (your checking account balance and your savings account balance are both just ledger entries backed by the full faith and credit of the bank). Nobody considers that borrowing, why then is a bond sale considered borrowing?

    8. Its one thing to be mercenaries of the rich.

      It is another thing entirely to get things WRONG. Examples are the money multiplier and government “borrowing.” Neither happens.

    9. @Neil Wilson
      Disconnect at the BBC: the disconnect is indeed everywhere. We see it here in Canada where the bank financed think-tank CD Howe Institute was grinding on about how every dollar of the debt has to paid back soon while the economists at the Royal Bank of Canada (the largest commercial bank in the country) said there was no hurry to reduce spending.
      The needs of the pandemic have caused the disconnect. Once it is over the neo-liberal austerity/privatisation consensus will begin warning of the need to repay the debt and “tighten our belts”. All the media, big finance think-tanks, and most political parties will repeat it relentlessly. Functional Finance was part of mainstream discussion after World War II but was eventually submerged by bastard Keynesianism and later, worse, by neo-liberalism.
      Hence the importance of MMTed to get as many people as possible to understand what the potential of our economies truly is and why.

    10. The Conservative party might be Keynesian in its spending but this has been followed in the recent budget with a rising of taxes. Rising income tax liabilities in a country that is just getting out of the pandemic is as old wrongheaded economics as it gets.

    11. ‘But you have not fully grasped how the edX MOOC system works.’
      Many thanks Bill for making clear what I’m sure was already clear to everyone else! Meanwhile Ive decided to commit to memory the recurring (in this blog) ‘sectoral balance’ ‘equations’ using ‘Macroeconomics’ (the signed copy I bought at the launch).

    12. The BBC (and a bunch of other people) are still blowing it by referring to bond sales as “borrowing.”

      The problem is they are correct. “Borrowing” simply means “take and use with the intention of returning it”. And in that very narrow sense the BBC is accurate. And I’ve had that from the BBC’s complaint department when I raised it with them. They justify it on the grounds that they are simplifying the process for the reader.

      When a bond is sold, the reserves are taken and ‘used’ (ie deleted) When the bond is redeemed the reserves are given back (ie recreated).

      However the BBC did say this:

      “I note that in your email to us you were concerned that there might be an implication that the government could run out of money. I don’t believe we stated that or even implied it in the article which also looked at debt and the deficit, and the prospects of a double dip recession. We would not want to alarm readers and indeed you have explained in your email why that would not happen.”

      So if anybody ever hears the BBC suggest that cards are filling up or whatever, please raise a complaint immediately and remind them that they have accepted that can never happen, having had it explained to them.

      If you have reason to complain keep it polite, short and to the point. That applies the most political pressure. Don’t give them an excuse to dismiss you as a wing nut.

    13. Neil, one could argue that the Treasury is borrowing reserves from the Fed, although it would be equally valid to say that the Fed is borrowing bonds from the Treasury. We generally don’t refer to that kind of swap as borrowing, just as we don’t refer to a currency exchange as borrowing.

      The reason I object to the characterization of this swap as borrowing is that by using that term, commentators (intentionally or not) imply the possibility of default and future interest rate dangers and burdening of future generations that don’t exist.

    14. Hi Bill

      am enjoying your Blog and the MMT Course which is what brought me to your Blog.

      Re “Regular readers will know that while I think the EU should be broken up I have always held that it should be reconstituted as intergovernmental agreements (which democratic states can withdraw from any time they are not working for their citizens).

      What purpose would that achieve? Well there are some issues that require scale and impact across currency borders. The pandemic is one of them. We all need to work together to get rid of the virus threat.”

      I would add to that the need for common environmental standards across Europe.

      When the UK was part of the EU it eventually had to clean up its dirty beaches and water treatment — but only after being fined and highlighted.

      So many climate initiatives also may need a common approach.

      As a remainer, I was pleased to see some of your reasoned arguments for leaving, which from our side of the Globe have been very thin and usually based around self interest and political expediency.

      the only adequate reasons I had heard up to then, were that it was a protected Zone that disadvantaged in Trade terms, many developing nations such as Africa , and a farmer friend who said he voted “Leave” because he was mindful of Schumacher and “Small is beautiful” — that things tend to get unwieldy the bigger they get.

      I have been revisiting J K Galbraith this morning and his work The Age of Uncertainty, whose BBC program in 1977 first really interested me in Economics (although I had been studying it for 2 years prior)

      I read with interest from the Wiki page:

      “Galbraith fully acknowledged the successes of the market system in economics but associated it with instability, inefficiency and social inequity. He advocated government policies and interventions to remedy these perceived faults.[1] In his book Economics and the Public Purpose (1973) he proposed the extension of the planning system used in the industrial core of the economy to the wider market economy. He argued for a new socialism, with more steeply progressive taxes, public housing, medical care and transportation, public support of the arts and the conversion of some corporations and military contractors into public corporations.[2]

      He was the most read social scientist of his era. Galbraith’s association with the U.S. Democratic Party and his criticism of fellow economists, who promoted individualistic free-market economics that he perceived as a false social reality, occasioned strong responses.[3] He was of the opinion that “Wealth is the relentless enemy of understanding”.[4]”

      end of quote–

      I remembered what my Father and I both appreciated was that the free market was not sufficient for our Society and remembered there was, at that time terrible industrial unrest and large unemployment — which prompted my going to Italy eventually = only to return 2 years later to Thatcher and her economic madness under the thinking of keith joseph and milton friedman!

      here is another wiki quote

      “The leader of the British Conservative Party, Margaret Thatcher, and Keith Joseph objected to the screening of the series by the BBC as they perceived it too biased for a state-run TV station. Milton Friedman was brought over from Chicago to lecture against Galbraith’s economic viewpoints with Nicholas Kaldor opposing him.[8] The Daily Telegraph and The Spectator, publications associated with the Conservative political party, dismissed the series whilst the Financial Times and New York Times viewed it positively.[9] Milton Friedman presented his own response to Galbraith in his series Free to Choose.[3]”

      end of quote—

      It seems there have always been vested interests at work, and my only concern is with us – the UK leaving the UK, we are now at the hands of much more incompetence and chicanery, then we were when we were under EU jurisdiction, especially with our own opt outs and currency.

      we are also having to endure the results of a cobbled, very hard ‘Leave” that could have been better graduated especially as our Economies suffer the Pandemic.

      the persistent conundrum of still having a part of our UK remain in the EU as is the case with Ireland is exposing the flaws of such a hard departure , where some sort of barriers to trade and commune now are seen, a result of trying to avoid a hard border within, has provoked discontent, where previously there was none.

      It is and was a badly timed exit, costly in both monetary and admin terms and a rushed solution to such a complicated situation was never going to bring about fairness and proper scrutiny, without being gradually introduced over many many years.

      The cliff edge is now claiming victims.

      But Vaccines yes are being rolled out thankfully and will hopefully permeate the globe too and maybe herald a new better united nations responses to all illnesses and famine and poverty wherever it may be, but then again I am ever the optimist.

      best wishes to you and your readers.

      keep safe sane and smiling

    15. @bill asked how as a remainer how do I feel about the UK vaccinating at a rate of knots while the EU program is in disarray?

      With pretty much the worst response to the pandemic and a fatality rate to go with it, driven by an appalling lack of competency in making timely decisions, the one thing the UK got right was procuring vaccines very early on in the pandemic. But mind you, the Johnson Government are pretty keen at spaffing huge amounts of money if it means enriching their chums, I give you £22bn on a near useless test and trace system, as well as an an eye watering proposal to spaff 100bn on a “moonshot” testing program. Luckily adults were in charge of procuring and administering vaccines.

      Whether we were in the EU or not, the UK could still have procured it’s own vaccines, just as Denmark and Austria is now doing, and in fact we had the option to join, but I can’t remember if Johnson lost the email, or just told the EU to piss off…

      The EU’s procurement program has been beset by shortfall’s in supply, which apparently is not unusual, because of poor vaccine yields, which I uunderstand has possibly happened in the EU’s case. The EU has not been winning any friends, after trying to pressurise the UK arm of Astra Zeneca into diverting supplies promised to the UK to the EU, and now holding up a shipment to Australia.

      Meanwhile, the EU, US, Australia… and the UK… are opposed to WTO amendments which would enable less wealthy nations to increase vaccine supply… sounds to me like there is a good dose of hubris and hypocrisy all round.

    16. Why don’t countries make their own vaccines. It is not secret knowledge how to do it.

      Last time I checked all western countries have about the same tech level and access to piblic journals.

    17. @Tom Y.

      “Why don’t countries make their own vaccines?”

      They are. Australia for instance will make 50 million doses, manufactured by CSL under licence from Astra Zenaca.

      The issue is lead time to test and approve a vaccine. The UK was I believe the first nation to approve a vaccine (Pfizer) and that was only in December.

      9 months is an astonishingly short time to produce, test and approve a vaccine. If you didn’t start your vaccine trials at the start of the pandemic, then you are best seeking a licencing deal like Australia.

    18. “But mind you, the Johnson Government are pretty keen at spaffing huge amounts of money if it means enriching their chums”

      What MMT tells us though is *that doesn’t really matter*. In fact when the ‘chums’ spend the money lots of people get employed and have a job. The Royal Estates being the main case in point.

      Both the private sector and the public sector work by spraying large amounts of money at all sorts of crazy ideas. Up to 90% of private funded projects fail. Why do we not get similarly upset at the general uselessness and mates pocket lining of private sector funding?

      The difference is that the private sector has ‘the market’ to pare back those that don’t work and bankruptcy to clear up the debris. The public sector gets no such free pass. They apparently have to spend accurately and correctly all the time – which is impossible.

      We need to start giving public funding the same sort of ‘free pass’ as private funding. A few people sit down and make decisions, most of which will turn out to be wrong. They spray money at crazy ideas, and 1 in 10 of them might work. 1 in a 100 will revolutionise the way we live and increase our standard of living massively. The rest just ends up in the circulation and returns back as taxation in due course anyway.

      We’ve seen from the EU approach what penny pinching in a time of crisis means. Piles of dead bodies. I’d suggest a few Tory cronies obtaining a few more electronic impulses than they otherwise would have is a price well worth paying to save the extra lives.

    19. Hi Neil,

      Johnson spaffing money at chums, is not about the sum mattering, in fact the sums involved very clearly show how Government’s with fiat currencies are not financially constrained.

      It’s about the poor decision making involved. Spaffing money in this case did not save lives it cost them, but it has netted the favoured companies in the private sector an impressive amount of revenue.

      The UK already has a network of highly skilled contact tracers, but they work in the public sector, and they were completely bypassed to set up a failed call centre model, which suited private sector contractors. This system was judged back in September to be only marginally effective. Public sector contact tracing achieves around 95% success rates, compared to the 60ish per cent from the call center system. The higher figures published for contact tracing, include the public sector contact tracing, which also costs a fraction of the private call center system.

      In a pandemic, if you spaff people die. You don’t have the luxury of crazy ideas. Opportunity cost matters, you have limited resources, you have only so many people skilled at contact tracing. You can’t buy new ones, you have to deploy the ones you have as effectively as you can.

      If you cling to your ideologies, people die. So we have a government who was willing to spaff 100bn on a moonshot, judged to be largely ineffective and potentially counter productive, while properly funding people so they could afford to self isolate was a step too far.

    20. “The problem with spaffing money on your chums is that it corrodes trust in the social contract.”

      The problem with trying to do anything different is that you end up with layers of bureaucratic inefficiency while lots of people get employed checking things aren’t being spent on chums, or assessing endless tenders or applications from half-a-dozen different entities using increasingly complex blinding mechanisms. And all those layers of bureaucrats and tender writers end up becoming the chums of the other lot.

      Not only is there is loss of money on checking and failed tenders (which just end up being charged to the next project), but the process is very, very slow. And in this situation that would mean people die.

      You waste money on chums no matter which way you go. It’s just a question of which chums get the money.

      It’s rather more difficult to avoid ‘waste’ than simplistic slogans would suggest.

    21. @Creigh Gordon

      Yes I agree with you. Neil’s answer talks about the issues with competitive tendering, rather than dealing with trust in general.

      According to a recent survey a majority of people believe that the Government’s procurement was corrupt.

    22. Cont.

      This belief is somewhat unsurprising, when considering long held views about Tory cronyism. Matt Hancock setting up a secret VIP system to fast track bids, civil service leaks questioning the legitimacy of the VIP system, the presence of stories such as Matt Hancock’s local pub landlord getting a contract, and other stories where private equity companies got contracts to supply PPE, while companies who had actual factories to make PPE were ignored.

      Unfortunately spaffing money at companies wasn’t particularly successful either, especially from a PR perspective, with over promising and under delivering.

      But then the spaffing would have been largely unnecessary if the UK had a supply system which was adequate. The NHS supply chain is delivered in a 4 layered system, by 11 separate companies, one of which was Unipart. The UK government only stopped NHS supply chain from running down stocks in February.

      Much of the early chaos was not down to the NHS lacking supply, it was down to logistics. Unipart was running a just in time model, and during peak demand would cancel or downgrade orders.

      Apparently this privatised model was meant to deliver 2.4Bn in savings, but instead exposed front line staff to unnecessary and unacceptable risks.

      The problem is when you are lining your mates up for the job, they are probably not the best people to do it, which is why Government’s have rules about such things.

    23. our labor party seems to be making the same mistake as their uk comrads,

      trying to use debt and deficits argument against the morrison government.

      as you say , they should really be taking the high ground in all of this

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Back To Top